HY-brid/

I recently read an article in the USA Today, “Green Claims by Marketers Go Unchecked.”  The article stems from a June 9, 2009 hearing before the Subcommittee on Commerce (Trade and Consumer Protection of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce) discussing the lack of legislation for companies regarding green claims.  Not surprisingly, since 2000, the FTC has taken legal action against only three companies for violating the guidelines.  The FTC was not set up to monitor green claims.  Since the 1980’s companies have been using environmental messages, but at no time has the Commission been responsible for monitoring so much at one time.

M. Scot Case, Vice President, TerraChoice Group, Inc. and Executive Director, of the EcoLogo Program put it best in his summation:

U.S. consumers want to buy greener products, but they are confused by competing environmental claims, unsure when a claim is accurate, and increasingly skeptical of all environmental claims.  As a result, the recent focus on green jobs, green manufacturing processes, and a green economy could collapse because of inadequate, competing, and even contradictory definitions of green.

The current system is not working:

• Greenwashing is rampant.

• FTC is not equipped to define green.

• The United States lacks a single, unifying environmental label to make “buying green” easy for U.S. consumers.

As a green communications professional, I find this to be an unfortunate reality that has led to a great deal of consumer confusion and skepticism.  As HY-brid, we work with our clients to develop and deliver green messages that are transparent. 

To find out more about greenwashing and eco-labels visit http://www.hy-bridgreen.com/why-go-green/.

Categories: Marlaina Quintana, green marketing